Quora || 围观为工作:大晚上,为啥印度全境亮,中国显得半边?

问题:

How does India successfully light up the entire country at night while
China doesn’t?

否底印度会当夜间点亮全国,中国也绝非?

问题讲述:

当即是印度之夜光图:

亚洲城误乐城ca88网站 1

顿时是神州的:

亚洲城误乐城ca88网站 2

怎么印度能够于举国上下提供电力,中国的电力供应却大部分聚齐在东部呢?

回答:

印方辩友

Shashank Kumar:

Because the image is afake.

为贪图是假的。

This Is not India at night. The image is actually as old as 2003 and was
created by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
scientist Chris Elvidge, to highlight population growth over time.

立马不是印度底夜灯光图像。这张图是2003年之,是国海洋与大量管理局(NOAA)的科学家克里斯·埃尔维奇绘制的,用来突显人口随时间的增强。

As NASA’s Earth Observatory says , it’s a colour-composite image created
from satellite photos over time; white areas show city lights that were
visible prior to 1992, while blue, green, and red shades indicate city
lights that became visible in 1992, 1998, and 2003 respectively. There
are several versions of this image.

就是如NASA的球天文台说的,这是殊时候的卫星图像经过彩色合成的图样。白色之区域代表1992年前之市灯光,蓝色,绿色,和红色部分各自代表1992,1998跟2003年底都灯光。关于这张图还有很多不同版本的。

亚洲城误乐城ca88网站 3

亚洲城误乐城ca88网站 4

Just think why would Kashmir region be more lit while the central India
which is much more developed so sparsely lit.

万一考虑也甚克什米尔地区为底那么亮,而兴旺之印度当中亮点也相对稀疏。

This image is gose viral every diwali(a festival of lights) in India
too. But it has been debunked time and time. According to NASA “In
reality, any extra light produced during Diwali is so subtle that it is
likely imperceptible when observed from space,”

当即张图在历年印度免灯节的时光吗是刷屏刷的跟中病毒似的,不过就让辟谣了,NASA说破灯节增加的那么点儿额外灯光太单薄了,根本无克起高空观测到。

我方辩友

Colin Mao:

According to NASA’s 2010 photos, we can see that China is not entirely
lit up. The lights are mostly gathered along the ocean and in big
cities.

高达图是NASA
2010年之图像,我们会看到中华尚未全境点来得。灯光主要集中在沿海与异常城市地段。

There are several reasons for this:

缘由如下:

·The population density in those north-west areas are far less than in
south-east areas.

·西北地区的人口密度远低于东南地区。

·The geographic problem: There are mountains and plateaus in north-west
China, which makes transport of electricity to those areas difficult.

·地理方面:中国西北部多山,以高原为主,这多了电力输送的难度。

·And as for the cost, due to low population density, it would be a waste
of money to set up electrical lines for them since only a few people are
using electricity in those areas.

·由此,因为人口密度低,用的总人口掉,在这些地方铺设电网显然是休经济的。

(在此处要补一下哈,这个对出少数误导性,政府未曾抛弃这些地方,截止2015年12月23日,我国都兑现全国电力全面覆盖。)

·I think the most important reason is that India has almost
thesamepopulation as China while it only has1/3 of China’s size.

·至于印度,我觉着关键是她发生同华夏多的人口数,国土面积却偏偏生华之三分之一。

Chinese big cities are all well-developed and their electric systems are
too. So don’t worry about it.

华的很城市已生强盛了,电力系统也是这般,所以并未啥可担心的。

Young Zhang:

亚洲城误乐城ca88网站 5

The yellow line in this map is called Hu Line, The latest data(2015)
showed

贪图备受的黄线是胡焕庸线。根据2015的摩登数据展示,

57% of the area, but only 6% of the population in the orange area

橘黄色的区域占国土面积的57%,人口总量也独自出6%。

43% of the area, but 94% of the population in the red area

红色区域占国土面积的43%,人口数却胜过臻总人口的94%。

This line in your picture is like this:

即时漫漫线呈现在灯光图中尽管是这般的:

亚洲城误乐城ca88网站 6

尚闹其它答主晒起了举世电力供应图,中国的电力供应是印度的五加倍,侧面佐证了即张夜间光图再次多之让地形和人数的影响,不克作为经济腾飞程度比的凭。

亚洲城误乐城ca88网站 7

胡焕庸线

亚洲城误乐城ca88网站 8

下是知识点,知识点,知识点哈~

胡焕庸线

亚洲城误乐城ca88网站 9

纵然我国著名地理学家胡焕庸(1901-1998)在1935年提出的分我国人口密度的对比线,线两侧是少数只截然不同不同自然跟人文地域。

亚洲城误乐城ca88网站 10

亚洲城误乐城ca88网站胡焕庸先生

胡焕庸线又可当作什么线,

我国之城镇化水平分割线,

情景上的降雨线,

形势区域分割线,

知转换的分割线,

中华民族界线

。。。

实在,时至今日,胡焕庸线背后发布的国情人口以值得给予充分重视,也是地学研究中重要性的课题。再次指向胡老先生代表崇高的尊崇!